Hi Si

I read this the other day but didn't have time to comment. Now I am done 
getting ready for our trip tomorrow and I have a moment to breathe. My 
thoughts:

1. Fascinating that this is the *opposite* of Evergreen notes, which is all 
the rage now.
2. I think it would make more sense to allow overwriting notes, but take a 
moment to think things through in the moment: might I need this version's 
info later? Like Tones said, a combination approach. There could be 
academic fields or professions where tracking the development of one's 
thoughts is pretty important. But probably most people would feel fine 
adding to or updating a note.
3. It would be interesting to know the personality types (whether using 
Myers-Briggs or OCEAN) that gravitate toward certain notetaking tools. This 
person seems like he could be an OCD type, feeling the need to have all 
information organized thoroughly.
4. The article seems also to be pre-release propaganda for the Idea Flow 
product. Probably best just to evaluate Idea flow when it becomes available 
for preview. Maybe seeing it work will give us an idea on how to implement 
in a useful way.
On Thursday, July 15, 2021 at 2:18:48 PM UTC-5 Si wrote:

> I just came across this post: https://thesephist.com/posts/inc/, and it 
> challenges a lot of my own views on effective note-taking practices, so I 
> thought it was worth sharing here.
>
> The author advocates for a kind of chronological system, where as a rule 
> notes are never updated after they are made, meaning that they retain a 
> fixed position in time. It kind of reminded me of Soren's random thoughts: 
> https://randomthoughts.sorenbjornstad.com/
>
> Anyway this approach seems completely counter to my current approach to 
> note-taking, where I want my notes to represent ideas that I am building 
> over time with little regard to where or when they originally came from.
>
> I'm not particularly convinced, but I'm curious if anyone here has any 
> thoughts? Do you see any advantages to this approach? Disadvantages? Do you 
> think it could gel with the zettelkasten philosophy, or are they polar 
> opposites?
>
> Just interested in hearing other peoples thoughts.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWiki" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ee4d8847-f3e2-4ee7-983c-a01d1cc81f46n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to