I just came across this post: https://thesephist.com/posts/inc/, and it challenges a lot of my own views on effective note-taking practices, so I thought it was worth sharing here.
The author advocates for a kind of chronological system, where as a rule notes are never updated after they are made, meaning that they retain a fixed position in time. It kind of reminded me of Soren's random thoughts: https://randomthoughts.sorenbjornstad.com/ Anyway this approach seems completely counter to my current approach to note-taking, where I want my notes to represent ideas that I am building over time with little regard to where or when they originally came from. I'm not particularly convinced, but I'm curious if anyone here has any thoughts? Do you see any advantages to this approach? Disadvantages? Do you think it could gel with the zettelkasten philosophy, or are they polar opposites? Just interested in hearing other peoples thoughts. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/b59ee8de-8f1f-4044-a56a-73cfbf0aafdan%40googlegroups.com.
