> I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format already via TW.
One reason is just that it takes time to build stuff, even in TiddlyWiki, and if a decent tool already exists that time might be better spent elsewhere. On Saturday, 24 July 2021 at 10:57:26 UTC+1 TiddlyTweeter wrote: > Ciao Si > > It is a VERY interesting thread! > > Point being that a solo wiki needs ways to garner the richness of the > uberwelt. > > BUT I think it COULD, also, be interesting to turn the issue on its head. > > FOR an instance: What internet things could TW SERVE? > > On Android then QUINOID is a pretty good link collector. > As, also, on the other platforms done well by TIDDLYCLIP. > > *My point. *Does the adjudicative have to be OTHER than TW? > OR can we replete ourselves already? > I see NO reason NOT to save ourselves universally in our own format > already via TW. > > Turning the issue around simply becomes ... > WHICH UNIVERSAL, CROSS-PLATFORM, NET-WORKABLE TW saver is best? > > *Google Keep? Forget it!* > * Where is TIDDLER KEEPER?* > > Just comments > TT > > On Wednesday, 21 July 2021 at 21:10:04 UTC+2 Si wrote: > >> This question was prompted by a discussion over in the thread on >> incremental note-taking >> <https://groups.google.com/g/tiddlywiki/c/nEDB3zRBALY/m/GjP2BqE-BAAJ>. >> >> In my opinion a major weakness of TiddlyWiki is that it is not well >> suited to quickly capturing information on the fly with minimal friction. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/ed19c6fc-d764-4315-b081-1f9d97872855n%40googlegroups.com.
