On Aug 9, 10:58 am, Eric Shulman <elsdes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Tobias Beer: > > I guess you can't just break the html code the way you did by > > splitting the opening tag and the closing tag into different <html> > > sections. I would guess that whatever tag you open in one html section > > must be closed in the same... or, if not, this automatically happens. > > You are correct. Each <html>...</html> block is processed separately > by the browser's rendering engine, so that any matched "open/close" > HTML tags syntax must occur within the same block.
Yeah I sort of figured. It makes sense, just wish it worked some other way. Eric, what do you think of extending the ## syntax to match name= anchors (and I guess in newer browsers arbitrary id= can also be targeted using the fragment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fragment_identifier). With the caveat that it works only for links and not for <<tiddler ...>> calls. Unless there is a tiddlywiki way to add an id attribute to a div/span in which case the <html></html> hack isn't needed and including text with an id is reasonable. -- rouilj -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlyw...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
