+1 for moving http://tiddlywiki.org to TiddlySpace
Agree that we should us the migration to refresh and improve the content. Also feel that it would make sense to use a strength of TiddlySpace and separate out content in to different spaces. In some instances where we thought we were lacking content/ documentation this has started to happen. The following spaces are being worked on and include both TiddlyWiki and TiddlySpace content, with it all being pulled together in docs.tiddlyspace.com: tiddlywikidev.tiddlyspace.com macros.tiddlyspace.com shadowtiddlers.tiddlyspace.com wikitext.tiddlyspace.com faq.tiddlyspace.com Cheers, Colm On Jan 20, 1:18 pm, chris.d...@gmail.com wrote: > The wiki athttp://tiddlywiki.org/is MediaWiki, not TiddlyWiki. This > has always been a bit of an embarassment. That wiki is also subject to > spam that without constant attention can get a bit out of hand. > > When the wiki was created multi-user platforms for TiddlyWiki were a > bit thin on the ground. Now, with TiddlyWeb and TiddlySpace there is > an actively maintained multi-user platform that can easily support the > documentary purposes of the wiki. > > So I'd like to propose that we being a process of migrating the > content ofhttp://tiddlywiki.orgto a space or collection of spaces > onhttp://tiddlyspace.com/ > > If people have concerns, objections or encouragement, please post > here. This is not a done deal, just a proposal, but the benefits seem > a win: > > * Using tiddly-dogfood for Tiddly things > * TiddlySpace can be configured to allow members-only editing to > prevent spam. > * The TiddlyWeb API underneath allowing multiple mode of editing, > reuse and mashing up. > > If as a group we decide to move forward with this proposal, then I > would like to suggest the follow migration style: Rather than automate > some process of copying all the content from the mediawiki server to > TiddlySpace, I think it would be far better to move content by hand > and piecemeal, leaving behind references to the new content and > editing the content as it is put into the new system. This provides a > structure upon which we can, as we do it, refresh all the content. And > a refresh is badly needed. > > Thoughts? > -- > Chris Dent http://burningchrome.com/ > [...] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
