> It should be a showcase and example of excellence for TW. > [...] > I don't see anything wrong in moving to tiddlyspace. If anything it > shall rejuvenate the documentation process.
Indeed, such a move would be quite welcome for the reasons stated. However, having been the primary/sole maintainer of tiddlywiki.org until recently, I've learned that diligently tracking changes is important. Granted, this might be more important to me than for others (OCD and all), but it still seems essential in this case. While I'm no fan of MediaWiki in general, its recent changes feed[1] has proven extremely useful. TiddlySpace/TiddlyWeb does not yet have adequate (IMO) facilities for efficiently and effectively tracking changes in detail. While three's some experimental support for diffs in TiddlyWeb feeds, in my experience that's very rudimentary[2] at this point (for a variety of technical and conceptual reasons). Obviously such concerns can be dismissed for those not suffering from control issues, paranoia and misanthropy... It won't affect me directly anymore, so I'm just sharing my experience - for science. -- F. [1] http://tiddlywiki.org/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges&feed=atom [2] e.g. no guarantee that every single revision will show up, visual presentation is far from ideal, no convenient undo/rollback -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
