I'm not a big contributor to the groups (TW and TWdev) but I feel strongly concerned with TW. I like this tool and I use it for personal and semi- professional purposes.
I was pleased to see there was a new impulse in the TWDev group. But I was disappointed when I read this thread. As Eric I'd like to see a more balanced approach to core development. And simply put I'd like to have some informations on the new features that are proposed for the new versions. > > * How should new TWCore features proposed and refined? e.g., online > discussions, tickets, conference calls, emails, personal > conversations, formal RFPs/RFCs (YUCK!), etc. I'd prefer some informal discussions on main topics, or important changes, here or better on TWDev > > * What criteria are used to evaluate new features? e.g., public > demand, code complexity/risk, adaptability (plugin potential), > backward-compatibility, cross-platform compatibility, etc. I'm not very concerned with backward compatibility, since I use only some plugins mainly from tiddlytools and I'm pretty sure Eric will adapt his work to the new features (?!) I think public demand through this forum is a good criterium. > And I agree with everything Måns said about "legobricks" :-) FrD -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
