On 7 Jul., 22:59, twgrp <matiasg...@gmail.com> wrote: > Disclaimer: I hardly understand what this is about at all. Some kind > of grammatical analysis tooI? hihi, it's like me.
> Anyway, here's a friendly suggestion: Instead of writing out each, hm, > thing, after every word like this: > Bonaparte/NNP has/VBZ been/VBN > I have to alternate suggestions. This format seemed to be "best practice". I did make it a different color and smaller, to make the tags less "aggressive". Andrew did an other tagger, that just colored the words but I can't find it anymore at his space [1] :( > 1) If it is desired that the text is still readible, then I'd suggest > to (somehow) put each.. thing... on a separate row under the original > text, like this: > Bonaparte has been > NNP ____ VBZ VBN I did a test page http://postagger.tiddlyspace.com/#TestSlices which shows an other possibility to get some tagging per sentence. I used TW slices to reference the texts. IMO this would be intersting sice you can use the results using eg: <<tiddler "anyTiddler::o1">> somewhere else in any tiddler. > I had to put in the line to create a space. In TW you could put in eg > or perhaps put it all in a table. > > 2) If it is not necessary to see the very.. things.. directly, then a > hover popup to show them would make for a more readible text, still > with the analysis readily available. I'm sure, there are many possibilities. IMO @andrew needs to tell us, what's needed :) He seems to be experimenting atm.... have fun! mario [1] http://andrewsimon.tiddlyspace.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki?hl=en.
