PMario wrote: > > > I know but if you have a look at empty.html. It has already 1218 shadow > tiddlers. Many of them come for UI configuration. We should try to remove > them and not make them more. The whole confi stuff makes TW terribly slow. >
@anyone who knows or has thoughts about it; If (if) one wanted to make a pull request to split out - just as a concrete example - the "New journal" and "New journal here" features, and provide them as a plugin instead, how would one go about this? Are the interfaces defined (not UI, I mean code-to-code)? Do all e.g "tools" (buttons) have the same interface parameters? I used toolbuttons as an example, is there much difference for other features? Can the various components be categorized/segregated based on characteristics and how easily they'd be externalized? Are there any established such categories? Would pluggifying e.g tools mean that if they were then plugged in so that the resulting TW appears just like the current unmodified version, then we'd get an even bigger file than the current unmodified because plugins presumably also carry some extra stuff, or is this very marginal? Thanks! <:-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d6f2897c-2975-4519-9b79-077f212421bc%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
