Hi Evolena, > Why? >> > > Because orphans and missing tiddlers, as well as backlinks/references, > only takes into account the links to explicitely named tiddlers (either > with the link widget or the [[...]] shorthand), but doesn't resolve all > the textReference (if the title of the tiddler you want to link to is > stored in a field) or variable used in, for example, templates. >
Ah, of course, I thought Hegart meant to say that he had some reason for which he wouldn't want them to count as a (back-)reference whereas it is a limitation of using dynamic text-references (e.g. in macros, lists, as parameters) that they won't. Best wishes, — tb -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/08ddeb0d-28fe-48d1-ba7e-6f951cbfe7d1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
