Hi guys, I may be sort of out of context as I read this group seldom these days, but here is what I'd like to ask/mention:
1. What do you think about TiddlyWiki.org? How valuable it is for you (I mean, I don't know, how many users of TiddlyWiki Classic like is out there)? Can it be stored somewhere so that it can be edited collectively like today? Or, more precisely, is anyone, among those reading this, ready to do smth about it (I guess, create hosting with TiddlyWeb platform, copy contents of the current wiki there and allow users to register and edit?) Actually, the same question for customize.tiddlyspace.com ... 2. EOL of TiddlySpace doesn't mean that tiddlyweb.com is going anywhere, does it? 3. Ok, this idea may be eclectic, but if we're talking about social aspect of using tiddlers, may be it would be useful to join another *social* engine and try to implement some extension for tiddlers in such a project. By saying this, I mostly mean Diaspora [1] which is open source decentralized social network (you may be have heard of already) and even if extending its main branch doesn't get approved by the core team, one can fork it and extend in any manner he or she likes to. At some early point of Diaspora development, there was even some buzz about Diaspora plugins, but unfortunately I can't find anything. I fully understand that implementation of this idea is very likely to be very time-consuming, but, well, I'd like to share it anyway.. Best regards, Yakov. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diaspora_(social_network) пятница, 22 января 2016 г., 17:28:12 UTC+3 пользователь Chris Dent написал: > > On Thu, 21 Jan 2016, Tobias Beer wrote: > > > Would you say it makes sense to... > > I think what makes sense depends a great deal on who is doing it. > Unfortunately we never really achieved frictionless tiddlyweb. > > > - figure out a local install of TiddlyWeb / TiddlyWebWiki > > - somehow replicate / migrate / import spaces there > > > > Right now I'm inclined to simply make local backups of all spaces. > > This, of course, will do away with any inclusion and produce standalone > > wikis. > > I suspect local backups (that include all the stuff that would be > included from other spaces if hosted on tiddlyspace) is probably the > most straightforward way to continue getting individual functionality. > > I'm sorry I can't give more concrete advice. I've never really become > all that savvy with TiddlyWiki. > > -- > Chris Dent http://burningchrome.com/ > [...] > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/72b7275f-9193-4cdf-9d94-232aa1a5b363%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
