Hi Jeremy, thank you very much for your answer. Being able to have a utility function that allows to load a JS module with a caller-supplied require() context or similar looks appealing. This would keep "aliasing" or dedicated module name resolution local to such modules that need it. And it would be cleaner than mucking around with $tw.modules.
Best regards, TheDiveO -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/cc5ea6e7-81a7-4d6d-99cb-4bb206219b40%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
