Hello Milind, sorry to bring it up, just curious if you got that? I am trying to have this small table of contents linking to the sections inside the tiddler.
BR, Roger On Friday, December 1, 2017 at 6:36:08 PM UTC-2, Milind wrote: > > Hi, > I am also looking for such a plugin to port my Tiddlywiki Classic > to the new Tiddlywiki. The tidtoc mentioned here > http://tidtoc.tiddlyspot.com/#GettingStarted looks very good. Is there a > version where the headings grouped in the TOC can act as links to the > headings in the tiddler? That was how the Tiddlywiki Classic TOC used to > work. > > Thanks, > Milind > > > On Thursday, 20 November 2014 05:55:05 UTC-8, Stephen Kimmel wrote: >> >> I use Tiddlywiki at work. I work with a lot of documents of different >> types. Some are legal documents and affidavits. Others are contracts and >> specifications. Some are well structured while others seem to ramble >> pointlessly. Some are lengthy while others are very short. I need to be >> able to figure out quickly which document contains a particular >> requirement. I've found that Tiddlywiki with its search function, and >> especially with Danielo's context search plugin, is almost perfect for my >> task.Everyone I've shown my wikis to has been envious. >> >> One key criteria in my line of work: for existing documents, I must have >> every word and character correct and in the right order. Most of these >> documents must not be edited. For example, I can't change any part of an >> existing contract. I can highlight portions of it but I must not change any >> word or word order or punctuation mark. Using a clause from one document in >> another is rare enough that simply copying is the obvious answer. >> >> Consider the two alternate ways of doing things; the preferred Tiddlywiki >> method of breaking my documents into small pieces and my current method, >> the document dump. >> >> I don't so much create tiddlers as dump documents into them. Dumping a >> document into a single tiddler is fast and easy. Open the word document. >> Copy the entire thing. Open the wiki. Create a new Tiddler. Paste the >> document into the tiddler. Name the tiddler to match the source document >> name. And I'm done. If I care to preserve the formatting, I add three quote >> marks at the beginning. Total time expended, perhaps a minute. If I really >> want to make it pretty, I can spend 10-15 minutes adding exclamation marks >> to mark headers or use Danielo's Keysnippet routine to convert some jumbles >> into neat tables. >> >> This creates what can be a very large tiddler. The search function works >> as expected and rapidly identifies which document contains which phrase. It >> has every character and every word in exactly the right order. It >> accomplishes what I need to accomplish with a minimal amount of effort. >> >> And the disadvantage? So far I haven't found one. If Tiddlywiki processes >> the tiddler more slowly, I haven't noticed. >> >> By comparison, the Tiddlywiki preferred choice, lots of little tiddlers, >> is a good deal of work. >> >> I've tried copying and pasting individual segments from the word document >> into individual tiddlers. Each smaller tiddler takes about the same amount >> of time to set up as my much larger single tiddler but after that I'm still >> not done. I still have to rebuild the original document from those >> individual tiddlers and I have to verify that I got all the material >> correctly. When that is done, I have to create a field and tagging system >> so that each smaller tiddler will reflect its source document and sort >> correctly so the table of contents will be right. >> >> If I saw any real advantage to using a lot of little tiddlers to >> accomplish the same thing that can be done with one large tiddler, I might >> go ahead and spend the extra time. The last couple times I went through >> this exercise, it took me hours rather than minutes. And what did I get for >> my effort? As close as I can tell, nothing but older. >> >> One thing that would make my life easier would be a table of contents >> that worked inside a single tiddler that was based on headers or some >> invisible marker. I know this has been requested more than once and now, >> perhaps, you can understand why I want one. A simple list of headers would >> be helpful. I could then use the browser's Find command to jump to the >> appropriate section. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/adc445cd-3fd4-4f01-9772-45fda2ab916a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
