After stepping through conditional breakpoints and other things, the tag operator is indeed the result of the massive slowdown.
[image: Screenshot 2019-09-25 13.46.38.png] The first line takes a long time to return, about 3 seconds per invocation. The rest of it is fairly quick. There is a source.byTag operation right before it that would be much quicker but I don't know where it comes from or what uses it. I guess that would take some investigating. But this basically means that using the tag operator for any tags which have many tiddlers is basically out of the question. So everyone's basically on the right track it seems. On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 12:44 PM 'Mark S.' via TiddlyWiki < tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com> wrote: > Ah, but if your tiddler represented the *smallest semantic unit*, then it > would be no trouble to add the Darcy tag at the top. > And you would notice immediately that you already have #DarcyIsPrideful, > #DarcyD'Man, and #DarcyHatethBottledWater. > > Later, when producing your final copy, you wouldn't have to scrape out all > the little # symbols, like pulling burrs off > a dog that's been wandering too long in the 100 acre forest. > > “If I ever go looking for my heart's desire again, I won't look any >> further than my own back yard. >> Because if it isn't there, I never really lost it to begin with… " >> > > Ok, a quote from P&P would be better, but I only read it once and never > understood what the zombies were doing ... > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 7:37:12 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter wrote: >> >> Its a very interesting issue, I think. >> >> I have NO idea if #hashtag in text field would be a PITA or not on >> performance in TW, not having tested it. >> >> I just think semantically it makes sense. I does well for the type of >> thing I write ... >> >> Mr #Darcy, cognisant of the plebesite, announces #BottledWater should be >>> banned. >> >> >> You get the idea. >> >> I SIMPLY like to write and sort out an order later. >> >> TT >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, 25 September 2019 16:24:01 UTC+2, Mark S. wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:25:05 AM UTC-7, @TiddlyTweeter >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> Personally I like the freeform taggery of tools like Twitter where >>>> #hashtag is simply an in-text string to match. >>>> >>>> >>> I was going to say that the hashtag would add a performance hit, but now >>> I'm not so sure. Using regular tags >>> actually created a performance hit. But one problem is that people, left >>> to themselves, will make multiple >>> variations of the same tag. >>> >>> #myhashtag #MY-hash #TAG-Hash #hash-tag-de-mio >>> >>> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "TiddlyWiki" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c1878946-113b-49ac-b66c-6a38c6f1f29e%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/c1878946-113b-49ac-b66c-6a38c6f1f29e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/CAJ1vdSScH6QUzdaV_eEHkF6yEYwPVofBndFwMXjPLt%3DRYOhrkw%40mail.gmail.com.
