I understand the argument for having two development lines, but there is a danger as well. Namely that we won't get enough people using the "advanced" jQuery line, and incompatibilities with existing plugins won't be found. That means it will become increasingly difficult for users of the legacy line to migrate to the jQuery line. It also means that people who want to write widely used plugins won't be able to use jQuery, since not all users will have jQuery.
So I think it is better to have the one development line, take more care about testing, and ensure problems are fixed quickly. Martin 2009/6/25 Ton van Rooijen <tons...@xs4all.nl>: > > see also > http://groups.google.co.uk/group/TiddlyWikiDev/browse_thread/thread/c7d270d638383b92# > where kind of same plee was made for splitting a temporarily > continued support of "legacy" 2.4.3 and > a separate 2.5-line with jQuery for the advanced users that > intentionally want to be ahead of the pack. > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To post to this group, send email to TiddlyWikiDev@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/TiddlyWikiDev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
