Hi Yakov! Thanks so much for making these! Because FeT has such a steep learning curve, I still haven't gotten around to learning it and implementing it, but the new features sound nifty. I do wish there were some form of wysiwyg or helping dialog box for making FeT events(?), that would show you what your options are and what you need, where, and perhaps select those from a list or radio button, and then perhaps spit the FeT syntax out for you.
The SetManagerPlugin looks REALLY nifty, and is something I've been hoping for for a while now. You're one of my top 5 favorite TWC plugin developers, and one of the few still active, so keep up the good work! -Leo On Thursday, July 24, 2014 4:13:02 AM UTC-7, Yakov wrote: > > Hi, > > среда, 23 июля 2014 г., 4:14:14 UTC+4 пользователь ocalTW написал: >> >> Yakov >> >> Strange indeed as I've been using this syntax for some years since TWC >> 2.6.1 or so. >> Moreover I have a good reason to use this syntax: I crafted a simple >> example for the demo, but most of the time the fet is in a function and I >> pass multiple tags as parameters. This is based on the example given by Udo >> Borkowski: >> http://tiddlywiki.abego-software.de/#[[List%20all%20Tiddlers%20that%20contain%20either%20a%20%27TaskToDo%27%20or%20a%20%27TaskOpen%27%20or%20%27TaskDone%27%20tag]]%20ForEachTiddlerPlugin >> >> * Main tiddler >> <<tiddler myFunction with: 'tag1","tag2","tag3' >> >> >> ** Function tiddler (simplified) >> <<forEachTiddler where 'tiddler.tags.containsAny(["$1"])' write >> 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>> >> >> Well, this is perfectly understandable, as you use the containsAny > method: it has an array argument, while contains method has a string > argument: you can use > tiddler.tags.containsAny(["tag1","tag2"]) > or > tiddler.tags.contains("tag1") > but not > tiddler.tags.contains(["tag1","tag2"]) > > By the way, if you use templates (or function tiddlers, as you called it), > you may be interested in this: > although passing filter expressions using the "with" param is somewhat > buggy with current TW core, with TransclusionFixesPlugin you can use it > without problems: > > <<tiddler myFunction with:'[tag[tag 1]] [tag[tag 2]] [sort[modified]] > [limit[10]]'>> > Function tiddler (simplified): > <<forEachTiddler filter '$1' write 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>> > > but this makes sence only if filters aside "tag" may be useful for you: > otherwise it only makes the template-using tiddler macro expression longer. > > Best regards, > Yakov. > > PS by the way, have you tried SetManagerPlugin? It is useful for setting > the order is lists manually and also for different "inline" editing. > > >> Regards >> >> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:08:57 AM UTC+2, Yakov wrote: >>> >>> Hello ocalTW, >>> >>> you are welcome; there's a mystake in your syntax: >>> >>> Hello Yakov >>>> >>>> Latest TWC version 2.8.1 >>>> Here are 2 sample very simplecases: >>>> 1 - Does not work: no output >>>> <<fet where 'tiddler.tags.contains(["systemConfig"])' write >>>> 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>> >>>> >>>> this should be >>> >>> <<fet where 'tiddler.tags.contains("systemConfig")' write >>> 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>> >>> >>> (note that systemConfig is surrounded by quotes, but not by square >>> brackets). I've tested this version, and it works fine (did your syntax >>> work before? that would be strange..). >>> >>> Best regards, >>> Yakov. >>> >>> >>>> 2 - Works >>>> <<fet where 'tiddler.tags.containsAny(["systemConfig"])' write >>>> 'tiddler.title+" "' end '""'>> >>>> >>>> I have since replaced all "tiddler.tags.contains" by >>>> "tiddler.tags.containsAny" in all my Tiddlywikis. >>>> No other issues found ever since. So thanks once again. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 6:08:10 PM UTC+2, Yakov wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello ocalTW, >>>>> >>>>> could you specify the whole syntax that you used? And, more >>>>> importantly, the version of TW. >>>>> >>>>> The thing is, indexOf, contains, containsAny, containsAll methods of >>>>> Array.prototype were introduced to the TW core in the version 2.4.2, >>>>> so I removed them from the plugin (the required CoreVersion, as you can >>>>> see, is 2.6.2 now), and they work for me because they are in the core. >>>>> >>>>> Best regards, >>>>> Yakov. >>>>> >>>>> суббота, 19 июля 2014 г., 0:01:08 UTC+4 пользователь ocalTW написал: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hello Yakov >>>>>> >>>>>> First of all, many thanks for your FETP work. I use fET *a lot*, and >>>>>> I tried your FETP right away. >>>>>> >>>>>> I confirm your about being backward compatible with fET in all cases >>>>>> I have already tested, except in the following one: when using >>>>>> "tiddler.tags.contains" in a "where" clause >>>>>> However, "tiddler.tags.containsAny" works, and in my case, I can >>>>>> easily add the "Any" word. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'll do more test s over the week-end >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH >>>>>> >>>>>> On Friday, July 18, 2014 12:44:30 AM UTC+2, Yakov wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hello everybody, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I feel like I have to share this ASAP, but writing documentation >>>>>>> takes much time, so I decided to make a pre-release of the 2 plugins, >>>>>>> meaning that I release only the plugins in the form of text, without >>>>>>> repositories, docs etc. I only have to mention that the licence is >>>>>>> usual >>>>>>> BSD-like and that ForEachTiddlerPlugin 1.2.4 is a fork of Udo's >>>>>>> ForEachTiddlerPlugin [1], so all proper credits to Udo. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywikidev@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
