Hi Rich,

I am glad it works as intended. While playing around with this myself, I noticed that it doesn't work when the image is a link. In these cases you have to right click -> open image in a new tab and then do the drag&drop. This adds another step, but the way I see it, it can't be helped, since in those cases the actual link URL will be dragged, instead of the image URL. So there is no way to get the image from that except with this additional step.

/Andreas


Am 19.02.2015 um 04:31 schrieb RichShumaker:
And that is awesome!!!
I just tried it on your demo site and 'boom goes the dynamite' it worked great. Changing the name is easy and makes sense to do as that way I get a real name and not 35q3145home235235.jpg or some other nonsense.

I agree the interweb image concept might be a bad plan as the web changes.
Maybe step 2 for me is to explore doing a WGet on my own TW to grab all the images locally.

Then my brain just jumped to switching all the images from oustide the TW5 to inside. Then I remembered, crawl, walk, run. Running first tends to lead to headaches, literally.

Rich Shumaker
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to