Andreas 

> sorry I am responding so late, but I didn't have time earlier.
>
> #heheh you are super fast and thanks for responding with the solutions.
Once I read your post I said d'oh!!! like three times

> I dragged from Firefox to Firefox the "Drag *this*" file and this error 
> came up 
> I tested with Chrome too and the same issue
>  Undefined widget 'dropimagezone'
>  
>    This suggests that after dragging, you didn't reload (which you should 
> do, because TiddlyWiki only loads the widget after a reload). Changing the 
> PageTemplate while the widget isn't loaded will result in this error, since 
> the PageTemplate changes immediately
>

Yes this was 'dumb' of me.(d'oh!!! #1)
You drag and drop the drag 'this' from your site and SAVE and then RELOAD
 

>
>   I saved the Firefox version and reloaded the browser and this shows up 
> at the bottom of the page
>   
> </$navigator>
>
> </div>
>
> </$set>
>
> </$set>
>
> </$set>
>
> </$set>
>
> </$set>
>  
>    Hmm take a look, if the <$/dropimagezone> tag is correctly placed. I 
> had this happen in my tests a few times, but in all cases it was caused by 
> tags not being closed properly in the PageTemplate
>

So if you open the <$dropimagezone> twice that won't work correctly #heheh.
d'oh!!! #2 Open then CLOSE </$dropimagezone>(mistake above)
I really opened it twice so really d'oh!!!!
 

> When it comes to the cross-browser dragging issues, then you are correct. 
> I noticed that while testing too. Fro CHrome and Firefox, this happens:
>
>
> * Chrome -> Firefox :  The image URL is dragged as pure plaintext, which 
> makes TiddlyWiki not recognize it as a URL. In this case you see the old 
> behaviour of it being put in the tiddler text as normal link. This is 
> theoretically fixable, since the same URL recognition just has to be 
> applied to plain/text drags too. This case also applies to pretty much all 
> other URL's dragged in from other application, such as an editor, your 
> email client, word/excel and so on.  
>
> * Firefox -> Chrome: The image somehow gets transported as binary data ? 
> .. Or Firefox encodes the actual image.. but then converts the MIME type to 
> image/bmp, which causes TiddlyWiki to create a weird tiddler with a "*.bmp" 
> name and unreadable binary data inside with lots of funny little black and 
> white questionmarks in it. However, this really confused me in my tests and 
> all I can say here is.. it just doesn't work and whatever Firefox 
> transmits, TW can't handle it at the moment. (Looks like it triggers the e 
> file import routing though)
>

Phewww no more d'oh!!!
Thanks for testing this as I thought I might have been going a bit looney 
when I was testing.

Now that I have fixed all the Open and Closed <$dropimagezone> 
</$dropimagezone> and made sure to save and reload before changing that, 
EVERYTHING works GREAT.
So again this is fun to work with and makes my life easier.

Rich Shumaker

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywikidev.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to