On Wednesday, August 21, 2019 at 6:03:43 AM UTC+2, Xavier Maysonnave wrote: ...
> 1 - Interresting behaviour. > Is there a way to influence the priority ordered list ? > You didn't comment Mario's clarification about chaining savers. > The priority is hard-coded. The priorities are "grown" over time, based on demand. Every saver implements a .canSave() function, which basically is a feature detection. The first saver that can handle the save request does it :) ... This behaviour makes sure, to work for novice users, with "zero configuration". ... We want to create sensible defaults. So if a user uses TW with a dat:// enabled browser AND we have a saver it should "just work". Is there any reason why savers are not chained ? > hmm, ... Nobody did create a backwards compatible PR ... yet ;) > 2 - I started to work on a saver. > I'll see the syncadaptor afteward. > Step by step :-) > I think, that's the right way to go. savers are much simpler at the beginning. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/4e18f2b7-8867-496f-8104-112d60ab208d%40googlegroups.com.
