On Thursday, August 22, 2019 at 10:22:43 AM UTC+2, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > Is there any reason why savers are not chained ? >> > > hmm, ... Nobody did create a backwards compatible PR ... yet ;) > > > What does "chained" mean in this context? The savers are already stored in > a priority ordered list. >
... Yea, but if a saver saves the file, the actions is stopped. ... It may be preferable for a user to activate several savers. eg: The PUT saver can save to a webDav enabled server. Then it stops ... BUT a local backup saver would be a nice thing to have. ... So 1 save action creates 2 different files. -m -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWikiDev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/ab63aa6e-5a75-4fe6-95f6-7b636d230839%40googlegroups.com.
