Folks,
There is a warning not to use curly braces or square brackets in the
tiddler titles
eg {text}
There is also a warning for [ ] square barckets.
eg [prefix[prefix[]] such as a filter. I understand this and would notmake
use of these as a rule.
However you can actually create tiddlers with these as such, I am wondering
the following;
- I understand for general use these tiddler names are problematic
because they will need special handling to allow parsing and transclusion
etc...
- That is these rules should be followed in general
- However I am keen to look at using such braces in special tiddlers for
handling various cases.
- An example may be using {fieldname} as a tiddler that provides view
and edit code for each fieldname.
- I could hide it behind a $:/fields/fieldname but I am finding value
using such short names because it is easy to remember, just bracket.
- It has the added advantage of being searchable fieldname will list
{fieldname}
- Perhaps I could even use {!!fieldname} as a field tiddlers title.
- I am already making use of the permitted (transcludableTiddler) naming
standard.
- I do not recall why I saw value in tiddlers named as a filter but I do
remember it could add a great deal of functionality.
I am currently working on a content authoring tool that allows quick
insertion of other tiddlers titles into the authors text, having field
tiddlers could do the same help insert a fieldname into wikitext
Thanks in advance for you thoughts
Tones/Tony
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TiddlyWikiDev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to tiddlywikidev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywikidev/fddf27ab-80c1-479e-ba4b-f61a49604ea5o%40googlegroups.com.
