On 06/07/2011 02:02 PM, Brian Hinz wrote: > Has anyone dealt with IANA yet? Are they not responsive? I would have > thought that having the specification controlled by someone that doesn't > necessarily have a vested interest in the protocol would be a good thing. > Assuming that IANA RFC's have some kind of steering committee, I wonder > what's involved with getting onto it. That would at least give TigerVNC a > voice... > > The auto-response that I received in regards to the request for a new pseudo > encoding said that the turn around time is typically 1 week. I can post a > summary back to the list once I've been through the process. Hello,
I tried to contact person from IANA who is responsible for RFB specification but he didn't respond. Please let us know if you have better luck. Regards, Adam ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ tigervnc-rfbproto mailing list tigervnc-rfbproto@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-rfbproto
