Yeah, 70 ms is generally not enough to become latency-dominant, unless you're dealing with a really high bandwidth as well (or a really low image quality.)
On 5/27/11 8:59 AM, Marc Weber wrote: > Excerpts from DRC's message of Fri May 27 15:53:00 +0200 2011: >> Network latency is VNC's Achilles heel. Since the protocol is driven by >> the client, each framebuffer update requires a full round trip, so the >> maximum update rate you can achieve is 1 / (ping time). That can easily >> [..] > > Well - the smaller the window - the faster. > So its not latency :) in my case. > > ping time is about 70ms. > > Marc Weber > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. > With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, > you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. > Download your free trial now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Tigervnc-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data protection. Download your free trial now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ Tigervnc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tigervnc-users
