Robert - Since the question needs to be answered in any case, I'd prefer to wait until that happens. Creating 1 patch instead of 2 would save time.
It would not make sense for me to make a judgment as to which was the correct behavior without being sufficiently informed about the matter. What do you think I am, a politician? ;) ...kidding... - Keith robert burrell donkin-2 wrote: > > On 9/12/07, kbennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Robert - > > hi keith > >> I would need to know the answer to my question before knowing what to >> include in the patch. > > include whatever you think the code should be :-) > >> If it's only MS, then I would change the interface name; if it's both MS >> and >> OO, then I'd add Javadoc. > > open a JIRA and include one patch for each alternative > > - robert > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Rename-Interface-Office-to-MSOffice--tf4418014.html#a12660042 Sent from the Apache Tika - Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
