Hi, On 9/13/07, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/12/07, kbennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I would need to know the answer to my question before knowing what to > > include in the patch. > > include whatever you think the code should be :-) > > > If it's only MS, then I would change the interface name; if it's both MS and > > OO, then I'd add Javadoc. > > open a JIRA and include one patch for each alternative
Or decide for yourself which alternative is better and submit a patch for that change. If you go through the thoughtwork of considering the alternatives and coming up with a reasoned proposal, then I think you have a very good case for getting your version committed. BR, Jukka Zitting
