Well, one thing for sure is that I am glad that I had several people respond. That shows me that there are some active developers on here. So, that helps. Did anyone go to ApacheCon in Atlanta recently? That is where I heard of Tika.
On Nov 27, 2007 12:57 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 27, 2007 6:04 PM, Keith R. Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > ...At some point during this process, you should post a new issue on the > > Jira > > issue tracker (http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TIKA). Be as specific > > as possible.... > > Which includes creating small, focused patches whenever possible. > Those are much easier to evaluate and handle than "big bang" patches. > > Also, including automated tests, and documentation when appropriate > (not that Tika has lots of that ATM) with your patches will make it > much easier for us to evaluate and trust your patches - so that will > increase their chances of being accepted and applied quickly. > > > ...I use "svn diff" on the command line, and call it from the root of > > the source tree.... > > I also use the svn command-line for all "serious" operations. IDEs > have nice diffs and history displays, but it's too easy, IMHO, to > overlook something when using them for svn operations. > > -Bertrand > -- "Conscious decisions by conscious minds are what make reality real"
