In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Using an interpolator with a slow basic clock as Magnus suggests is probably >the easiest way to prevent EMI issues, but it has some disadvantages such as: > >* You need to design a fairly tricky [...] I actually benchmarked the on in the PRS10 by feeding it a 1PPS generated from another Rb that was deliberately adjust approx 1e-10 low. I can't seem to find the results anymore, but if any of you want to reproduce it, it was a pretty trivial setup. As I remember it, the standard deviation was approx 3nsec, and I seeing some "missing codes", Ie: readings that just didn't happen in practice. Testing any other such design is similarly trivial. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list time-nuts@febo.com https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
