What I am trying to accomplish is provide a reference for my HP 3586C. I want to try my hand at the FMT in February.
I have a set of the Lucent RFTG-m-XO and RFTG-m-RB. My options are use the RB as stand alone or use the XO with the GPS, or combine the two. (I believe I have the "matched set" that should work together). Either way, they both output 15 MHz sine wave and the RB outputs 10 MHz square wave. Is there an advantage using one over the other? I would like to set them up together as the matched set they are supposed to be, although I don't think there is any advantage to that for me really. So, for starters I was just going to use the Rb's 10 MHz output. But the more I think about it, the more questions I have. >From reading all the previous posts about these the GPS does not disciplines the Rb. The Rb unit is there to take over in the even the GPS fails. So that leads me to believe that the XO is more accurate in the short term as long as it has something to steer it like a GPS or the Rb. So my guess is that the XO would really be a better choice, but I am back to dividing the 15 MHz down to 10 MHz. I understand about dividing by 3 and multiplying by 2. Could someone please provide a circuit? Am I right in my logic and am I going down the right path with my project? Thanks for all the expert support. Jamie --- John Ackermann N8UR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bruce Griffiths said the following on 01/19/2008 > 05:20 PM: > > James R. Gorr wrote: > >> I always assumed frequency references should be > sine > >> waves. If that is not the case, I guess I can > use > >> this for a reference for other equipment? And if > a > >> square wave is just fine, could I use a > clock-block to > >> divide the 15 MHz of the XO down to 10 MHz? > > If you ever have to do this, the clock block is an > unnecessarily complex > > solution. > > Actually, the Clock-Block is about the worst > possible solution to this > problem (since I designed it, I don't have to worry > about offending > anyone in saying that!). > > The synthesizer used in the Clock-Block has very, > very bad phase noise; > that's the price of very wide frequency coverage in > a single chip. > > I haven't done it to my unit yet, but from tracing > the circuitry of the > RFTG, it doesn't look like it would be hard to > bypass the 10 to 15 MHz > conversion circuitry and feed 10 MHz from the > oscillator directly to the > primary output. That would be a much better > solution. > > John > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.