Magnus Danielson wrote:
Hmm, do you get a feeling that I am actually object very much to just toss it into the processor. I think you are right. :)
I suppose you are familiar with the old American adage that says that to a man with a hammer every problem looks like a nail.... :-) Each of us is more familiar with one or another technology (broadly speaking), and tend to see it as the best way to solve problems. I am not immune from this...
Nothing wrong with software, but use it wisely. Build the test-benches as if you where doing a ASIC or full-custom design and thus also think about each compile costing you milions of dollars and a pipe-line depth of many months (6-9).
Given the rate of compiles that sometimes I do especially when near to find the solution of a problem that bugged me for a long time, I would be bankrupted since long, should each compile cycle cost me thousands or millions of dollars, even if bogus dollars... :-) :-)
I guess I am becomming more conservative by the day. From my own and others mistakes and succsesses.
This is a privilege of becoming older and wiser :-) Cheers, Alberto I2PHD _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
