Alberto di Bene skrev:
Magnus Danielson wrote:
Hmm, do you get a feeling that I am actually object very much to just
toss it into the processor. I think you are right. :)
I suppose you are familiar with the old American adage that says that to
a man with
a hammer every problem looks like a nail.... :-)
Yes. :o)
Each of us is more familiar with one or another technology (broadly
speaking), and tend to see it as the best way to solve problems. I am not immune
from this...
This is why I try to find more tools and more approaches.
Nothing wrong with software, but use it wisely. Build the test-benches
as if you where doing a ASIC or full-custom design and thus also think
about each compile costing you milions of dollars and a pipe-line
depth of many months (6-9).
Given the rate of compiles that sometimes I do especially when near to
find the solution of a problem that bugged me for a long time, I would be bankrupted
since long, should each compile cycle cost me thousands or millions of
dollars, even if bogus dollars... :-) :-)
I think you would learn important lessons in test-benching and overall
design before the "compile".
I guess I am becomming more conservative by the day. From my own and
others mistakes and succsesses.
This is a privilege of becoming older and wiser :-)
Whiee... I got so much to learn then! :)
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
