Hi

There are a few differences between what you are simulating and the schematics 
Bruce posted earlier. The collectors of the input stages (q1, q4 and q7) seem 
have to come unglued from the bases of the output stages. The 95 ohm / 100 nf 
roll off networks seem to have vanished from the emitters of Q1 and Q7. There 
are   a few other minor things. 

I suspect that once you get it back to a node-node feedback circuit, the 
impedance at the splitting point will drop and the isolation will go up quite a 
bit.

Bob


On Feb 12, 2010, at 2:57 PM, life speed wrote: 

> I seem to not be accomplishing much isolation from output to input, as well 
> as output to output.  Have I fumbled PSPICE somehow?  For each simulation, 
> Vac was set separately, with V1=0.707V at the input, while V6=0V at the 
> output (sim1).  Then V1=0V, and V6=0.01V (sim2).
> 
> 
> <clay_schem1.pdf><clay_sim1.pdf><clay_sim2.pdf>_______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to