On 04/18/2011 01:06 AM, Chris Albertson wrote:
I asked the question because I might want to build one of there but I
could not see how they coud be stable with just an RC filter. So the
answer is "they just are".
OK, so they are stable but why would it run at 10+16=26 and not 10.01+15.99=29
As I look around, the non-linearity provides a sample/injection lock
effect which creates the asynchronous mode. I haven't read the papers
through, not the time, but that's the concept I gather from the quick
browsing thru.
And what happens if I want to build a 10.01 reference clock? Could I
do that with a regenerative filter?
The capture range would be narrow while the 10.00 mode would capture it
as it would have a wider capture range.
As far as I have gathered the knowledge.
Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
