Don,

On 07/03/2011 12:29 AM, Don Latham wrote:
Hi Magnus: I goofed, it's actually 5.12 MHz, the driving crystal
standard for the ICOM 260A 2 meter transceiver synthesizer. I want to
use it with a transverter for moonbounce, hence would like to start out
with a solid reference frequency. Might even be overkill. See, I knew it
could be done with (almost) some 7400's :-)
Thanks for the hint! The thing to do then is to pick off some of the
existing xtal frequency, and as you say count to the common denominator.
A little varicap in the crystal circuit can then be driven by the phase
comparator...
Should not be too hard to do...
Don

So true. 10 MHz and 5,12 MHz is a little different. You need to divide by 125 to knock the 5's out of 10 MHz and get 80 kHz and then a divide by 64 from the 5,12 MHz if you choose to go the PLL route.

It should not be too hard.

For relative low feedback division rations it is fairly easy to achieve decent results.

Keeping the comparator frequency high ensures that the loop filter can do a decent enough job to keep the comparator frequency and overtones out of the sidebands without being forced into tight PLL bandwidths.

For a step-up PLL of low ratio the loop filter can be very simple and always lock up without too much difficulty. Even a passive lag can do at times. As always, shaping up things with an active PI loop filter is better. It all depends on the requirements.

Just make sure that you do not get a high Q cause that is a real downer.

I'm not saying that PLL is the best way to do things at all times, but for some applications the performance needed and applicability of a PLL makes it a fairly low hanging fruit, so just go for it. I guess that for your application it could very well work good enough.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to