Hi Could you generate a "lead" and a "lag" estimate of the signal (in addition to your "center") and integrate against each of them on the fly? If so you would need a *lot* less memory. I seem to recall you tried something like this on the one of the Loran receivers.
Bob -----Original Message----- From: time-nuts-boun...@febo.com [mailto:time-nuts-boun...@febo.com] On Behalf Of Poul-Henning Kamp Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 4:23 AM To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement Subject: Re: [time-nuts] WWVB BPSK Receiver Project? (fwd) In message <20120316085256.9e25deaeee4f7f8617989...@kinali.ch>, Attila Kinali w rites: >Hmm... do you mean you want to store all samples of an hour and then >avarage over it? That would be the ideal way to do it, since it would make one heck of a comb filter and eliminate pretty much anything else. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.org | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.