Magnus, this is very cool. Can you describe your cross-correlation setup with the Time-Pod? I'd like to play with it here and compare notes.

John
----

On 8/2/2012 12:36 PM, Magnus Danielson wrote:
Fellow time-nuts,

I have borrowed Björn's FTS1200 and OSA8600 and that complements my own
OSA8600 and OSA8601.

I use a HP5087A and one of the OSA8600 as references, such that I can
cross-correlate out the reference oscillators. I'm still not quite
satisfied just yet, so I may need to work some more to perfect this
technique.

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_OSA8600_OSA8601_20120802_1.png


Here you see the phase-noise of the four oscillators.
It is distinct how the white noise floor of the FTS1200 is around -141
dBc/Hz when the OSA8600s reach for -155 to -156 dBc/Hz.

The spurs on the FTS1200 may trace back to the fact that the FTS1200 is
-1.5 Hz of the references, but I like Johns comments on that.

You can see that the older OSA8601 has better 1/f noise and that Björn's
OSA8600 SN711 has higher 1/f^3 noise than any of the other three which
seems comparable. The OSA8600 SN711 and SN817 has comparable 1/f noise.

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_OSA8600_OSA8601_20120802_2.png


The ADEV plot of the oscillators.
The noise on the FTS1200 dominates, it's inital response, but it is more
clearly seen that the flat section is better and the OSAs.

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_OSA8600_OSA8601_20120802_3.png

The Hadamard Deviation plot of the oscillators.
The linear drift of the FTS1200 and OSA8601 is seen.

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_OSA8600_OSA8601_20120802_4.png


The phase difference plot of the oscillators:
The linear drift noticed from the ADEV plot and mostly removed in the
Hadamard plot is seen more clearly in the phase plot as quadratic
phase-shifts, a slot tendency on the other oscillatos can also be seen.

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_OSA8600_OSA8601_20120802_5.png


The Frequency difference of the oscillators.
The noise of the FTS1200 is visible. I haven't looked into it.

As you may have noted, the measurement length varies, I haven't looked
into it.

My OSAs has been heated for a fairly long time, even if they had a short
dip of voltage. Björns FTS1200 and OSA has been heated for almost 2
weeks now.

Measurement files:
http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/FTS1200_HP5065A_OSA86000_20120802_1.tim

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/OSA8600SN711_HP5065A_OSA86000_20120802_1.tim

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/OSA8600SN817_HP5065A_OSA86000_20120802_1.tim

http://rubidium.dyndns.org/~magnus/time/timelab/OSA8601SN1314_HP5065A_OSA86000_20120802_1.tim


Comments welcome. I will spend some more quality time on this now that
I've made a first stab at it.

Got to locate a cable so I can toss a well-heated 10811A into the battle.

Cheers,
Magnus

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to