Volker.....look at the subject line, the posting is in your hands, you dont need to just use the reply button, as somone did with a "digest" which forked the thread.. This means all the posing under "Digest...." are hidden from view and searching. You can edit the subject line but this does not always return to the old thread if you use he reply button. I think it depends on the mail client.
Alan
G3NYK
----- Original Message ----- From: "Volker Esper" <ail...@t-online.de> To: "Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement" <time-nuts@febo.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 8:44 PM
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] time-nuts Digest, Vol 101, Issue 152



Plot 1: MDEV of the time interval reported by GPSDO
Yes, Said, that are important issues.

By the way: I'm now writing in two threads, I don't know, why the original thread ("Z3805A cooling requirements?") was splitted... Can we please move to the original thread?

I am sure, that the noise of the GPSDO PPS-TI data is much to high to recognize the effects. I'm going to make a new setup, where I'll compare the GPSDO PPS with an external oscilator, e.g. an HP 10544 or the "high stability reference" within my SMX signal generator.

Volker


Am 22.12.2012 05:07, schrieb Said Jackson:
Hi Volker,

What is being plotted here? Efc? Time interval as reported by the GPSDO? External counter versus a stable reference?

It looks like the resolution is approaching 10ns/s (1E-08 at 1s), and that the short term effects may be hidden in this noise?

The effects are clearly visible in your first GPSCon plot, not sure if we can see the short term noise in these plots..

The 10811 I had tested went from ~3E-012 at 100s to ~2E-011 when the fan was on, I think both values are quite a bit below the noise floor of your plot so probably hard to measure.

Bye,
Said

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 21, 2012, at 6:47 PM, Volker Esper<ail...@t-online.de>  wrote:

Said,

Unfortunately I don't have the equipment to measure the phase noise of an HP 10811 (yet).

But I did some work on evaluating the results of my fan experiment. Within this posting you'll find two diagrams. The first (named "1_DF9PL...") shows five MDEV curves (Modified Allan Deviation), each of them measured at different times. Total time span is 30.5 hours.

At small tau values (up to 1000 s) only a slight increase of sigma over time can be noticed. However, at a tau of 5000 s or greater you can watch sigma making a big bump. Ok, that's what we expected before.

In diagram no. 1 it's somewhat fussy to recognize the change of a particular sigma(tau). Now, that we've got curious, we want to see, how the sigma(tau) changes over time. So I've been providing a second diagram ("2_..."), where sigma(tau) is a function of the time.

You can see, for example, the curve of tau=20480s developing a big hump, and falling back to a proper value after about 1800 minutes. All curves at a tau greater or equal 2560 do so.

At smaller values the curves are esentially less affected, but - they are not back at their starting value after 1800 minutes (30 hours)! You could guess, that the hump moves up to longer times with increasing sigma - but it doesn't. There is something significantly different below tau=2560s.

1 hour ago, I switched off the fan and laid back the aluminium cover. We wait and see.

And now, dear time nuts, it's time to go to bed.

Volker




Am 21.12.2012 18:53, schrieb Said Jackson:
Mark,

Your plot still shows excursions of +/-1E-010, about 100x higher base noise than the Z3801A/Z3805A are capable of achieving. Wonder where that noise is coming from? This noise is probably much higher than the thermal effects.

The original post was the question "does my Z380xA have reduced stability if I add a fan" or similar, I think the answer is shown to be "yes".

Volker, I wonder if you also see fan-induced spurs in the phase noise from 1Hz to 100Hz. I would not be surprised if the fan vibration adds significant spurs to the 10811A crystal.

Bye,
Said

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 21, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Mark Spencer<mspencer12...@yahoo.ca> wrote:

This plot should show the frequency change more clearly. (Same data just presented differently.)

It seems to me that the noise goes may be going down a bit for a minute or so just after the fan is turned on but I don't believe these plots provide conclusive evidence of this.


Regards
Mark Spencer
Message: 7
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 09:27:29 -0800
From: Said Jackson<saidj...@aol.com>
To: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
     <time-nuts@febo.com>
Cc: Discussion of precise time and frequency measurement
     <time-nuts@febo.com>
Subject: Re: [time-nuts] Z3805A cooling requirements?
Message-ID:<83ce0384-2996-4155-b51b-9d79910b2...@aol.com>
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=us-ascii

Great plots guys!

Looking at these results I think my original claim still
holds: ADEV goes up when a fan is involved versus no fan,
even on a double oven 10811..

Clearly visible on the 10811, maybe not so much on the MV89
but that unit seems to have frequency moves into the xE-010
region on Marks plot so maybe the effect is just a bit
hidden?

Bye,
Said

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 21, 2012, at 5:44 AM, Volker Esper<ail...@t-online.de>
wrote:

...and the picture of the experiment...


The picture enclosed can give you a first
impression. What we see is
the difference time between the GPS signal and the
OCXO (blue)
("PPS-TI"), which is an HP 10811. In red we can see
the EFC. The total
span is 24 h.

Before I applied the fan, the noise was at a
maximum of about +/- 20 ns.
Some hours after starting the fan the noise is much
greater. That should
have a significant impact on the ADEV.

I don't put the ADEV curves here, I make up for it
when the EFC
compensation is completely out of the scope, that
will be in about 12
hours. I don't have the ADEV at 1 s, but the ADEV
at 10 s has been
almost constant. The ADEV at about 1000 s has a
nasty bump now.

IMHO that fits to the physical facts: the airflow
will surely not affect
the 10 s ADEV since the OCXO tries its best to
isolate the oscillator
from short time temperature influences. However,
the turbulent air flow
that I applied will influence the longer time
ADEV.

Have a nice solstice

Volker




Am 21.12.2012 12:44, schrieb Volker Esper:

Yes, I made such a setup, it's now running 22
hours. I'll post the
results in two hours or so (if nothing evil
happens to the earth,
meanwhile).

Volker


Am 21.12.2012 03:35, schrieb saidj...@aol.com:
Wish I had more time to play with this
setup.

How about fellow time nuts spend some time
and present similar test
data on
their OCXO's to compare?

I was interested in the 1s to 100s ADEV,
and my runs were from 8
minutes to
20 minutes, certainly enough time to
capture data for 1s to 100s ADEV
measurements..

bye,
Said


In a message dated 12/20/2012 14:17:59
Pacific Standard Time,
mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org
writes:

On 12/20/2012 01:34 PM, Bob Camp wrote:
Hi

Temperature transients are not a good
thing for an OCXO. If you
deliberately use the fan to create a
transient, then yes the OCXO will
not be
happy. The question it - what happens after
the transient has settled
out? The
plot you have still looks a lot like a step
function.

I agree. Temperature steps stresses the
OCXO oven loop and easily
creates a gradient over the crystal. As the
oven loop tracks in, the
frequency returns to around normal. The
trouble with forced air over a
crystal is that the metal shield couples
very well and acts like a heat
sink. A think plastic cover over it and
forced convection doesn't have
the same effect. There is even being used
by at least one vendor. Works
very well for the extra cents of
manufacturing cost.

The HP10811 is recommended to be put in a
airflow-quiet corner of the
world. Look at it's mounting in the
HP5370A/B for instance.

Cheers,
Magnus
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

<DSCF1758_bb.jpg>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list
time-nuts@febo.com
https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts

End of time-nuts Digest, Vol 101, Issue 152
*******************************************
<MV89A Fan turned on at 460 seconds v2.png>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

<1_DF9PL_GPSDO_1_sigma(tau)_alle_MDEV_b.jpg>
<2_DF9PL_GPSDO_1_sigma(tau)(t)_alle_MDEV_b.jpg>
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.





_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.


_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to