Hi There *must* be an alignment procedure that sets these things up. They didn't put all those test points in there just for the fun of it. I'm sure that these units would work a bit better if we knew how to tweak them back to the original alignment specs.
Bob On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> wrote: > Fellow time-nuts, > > Considering that LPROs is pretty popular, I am a bit surprised that I have > not seen any major reverse-engineering effort on the LPROs. I have the > self-compiled LPRO service document, which collects parts of schematics from > patents, but still. > > My main reasons for asking is that I want to get a little better overview of > how they work, how I can tune them up and what signals is available where. > Naturally, always figuring if there is some interesting tweaks to be done. > > LRPO is just a traditional analogue rubidium, in compact format, sure, but > never the less. > > I have noticed that different FPGAs have been used over time. Curious about > the various jumpers and connectors in it. > > Cheers, > Magnus > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.