Hi

There *must* be an alignment procedure that sets these things up. They didn't 
put all those test points in there just for the fun of it. I'm sure that these 
units would work a bit better if we knew how to tweak them back to the original 
alignment specs.

Bob

On Feb 16, 2013, at 6:10 PM, Magnus Danielson <mag...@rubidium.dyndns.org> 
wrote:

> Fellow time-nuts,
> 
> Considering that LPROs is pretty popular, I am a bit surprised that I have 
> not seen any major reverse-engineering effort on the LPROs. I have the 
> self-compiled LPRO service document, which collects parts of schematics from 
> patents, but still.
> 
> My main reasons for asking is that I want to get a little better overview of 
> how they work, how I can tune them up and what signals is available where. 
> Naturally, always figuring if there is some interesting tweaks to be done.
> 
> LRPO is just a traditional analogue rubidium, in compact format, sure, but 
> never the less.
> 
> I have noticed that different FPGAs have been used over time. Curious about 
> the various jumpers and connectors in it.
> 
> Cheers,
> Magnus
> _______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to