I recently made some measurements between 3 oscillators. It wasn't a true 'Three-Cornered Hat' measurement because the measurements were made sequentially. When I do the three-cornered hat calculation for the hopefully 'better' oscillator, I end up trying to take the square root of a negative number. Is that a red flag that the data is invalid? If I ignore the minus sign, the results seem reasonable and I can successfully calculate from the result for each oscillator back to the measured results.

Ed

On 5/1/2013 12:08 PM, Tom Van Baak wrote:
Folks,

I asked about 3 cornered comparisons some time ago, and now have plenty
of data to start exploring, and way more than the 3 oscillators I had
when I asked six months ago.

Apart from Stable32, which I do not have access to, are there any free
tools which will allow me to perform 3 cornered comparisons between my
oscillators?

Thanks,

david
I use Excel on the { tau, ADEV } pairs when I want to get fancy, or just a 
calculator for something quick. You can sometimes simply eyeball it on a 
composite log-log adev plot.

I'll give the formula is below, but to understand, first consider this 
backwards example:

Suppose for some tau the ADEV of three oscillators is 6e-12, 8e-12, and 10e-12, 
respectively. But -- you don't know that yet -- because all you have is 
pairwise measurements. The assumption is that noise is rms additive. Let's do 
the numbers:

When you measure A vs. B you should get 1.00e-11, since that is sqrt( 6e-12 ^ 2 
+ 8e-12 ^ 2 ).

When you measure B vs. C you should get 1.28e-11, since that is sqrt( 8e-12 ^ 2 
+ 10e-12 ^ 2 ).

When you measure C vs. A you should get 1.17e-11, since that is sqrt( 10e-12 ^ 
2 + 6e-12 ^ 2 ).

So given your three ADEV measurement pairs (AB=1.00e-11, BC=1.28e-11, 
AC=1.17e-11) you just work backwards to compute ADEV for A, B, and C, as in:

     A = 0.707 * sqrt(+ AB*AB - BC*BC + AC*AC)
     B = 0.707 * sqrt(+ AB*AB + BC*BC - AC*AC)
     C = 0.707 * sqrt(- AB*AB + BC*BC + AC*AC)

Depending on how clean your measurement system is, and how well-behaved and 
modestly different the oscillators are, the 3-hat technique can work pretty 
well.

/tvb

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to