Oukaay - I should've known... Thanks, Jim!
Am 24.01.2014 21:12, schrieb Jim Lux: > On 1/24/14 11:57 AM, Volker Esper wrote: >> Nice! I didn't know that. But what a number, 300... Why such a >> digital-hostile factor? Why not 256 or 512? >> >> Volker >> >> >> Am 24.01.2014 20:51, schrieb tmil...@skylinenet.net: >>> 9.8304 MHz divided by 300 is 32,768 Hz. >>> Feed that to an electronic clock and you will have an atomic clock >>> of sorts. >>> >>> Regards > > > 9.8304 is 300 baud * 32768. So you can generate all the conventional > digital data rates (1200,2400,.., 38.4k with powers of two). > Typically, a UART wants to see a clock that is 16x or 8x bit time, so > you need something a bit higher. > > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to > https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.