Is the new RPi2 any different in that regard? On April 7, 2015 8:17:12 AM CDT, Daniel Mendes <dmend...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Internally the rPI is a ver awkward beast: the CPU is connected to a >GPU, and the GPU is connected to the GPIOs... so lots of jitter and >latency. > >It was designed to be a video decoder... the CPU is there for testing >and housekeeping. It works, surelly, but it´s not designed to have low >latency and jitter. > >Daniel > >On 07/04/2015 09:39, Hal Murray wrote: >> albertson.ch...@gmail.com said: >>> In terms of performance, ARM based credit card sized computers do >well if >>> you can get the PPS to the general purpose I/O pin that interrupts >on an >>> edge. the Pi can't do that the BeagleBone Black can and it sell for >$45. >> What/why can't the Pi do? I have one handy that is processing a PPS >on a >> GPIO pin. >> >> David Taylor has a web page with all the fine print on how to set it >up. >> (Thanks.) >> >> >> >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com >To unsubscribe, go to >https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts >and follow the instructions there.
-- Sent from my Motorola Droid Razr HD 4G LTE wireless tracker while I do other things. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
