What caused that degradation ? I'm interested in dos/don'ts for best use of a 10811.
On Sat, Apr 11, 2015 at 11:32 PM, Richard (Rick) Karlquist < rich...@karlquist.com> wrote: > On 4/11/2015 5:01 AM, J. L. Trantham wrote: > Unless the design has been changed, the 10811 option > for the 53132 has poor short term stability and > degrades the performance of the 10811 by something > like an order of magnitude. I complained about > this when the counter first came out 25 years > ago but no one would listen. At the time I had > recently transferred out of counter R&D to work > on the 5071A. > > Rick Karlquist N6RK > > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/ > mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. > _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
