That single-chip version is going to have a *LOT* less (and less variable) 
latency than an SDR.

> On Oct 27, 2016, at 12:20 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp <p...@phk.freebsd.dk> wrote:
> 
> --------
> In message <5a002554-8d90-4c75-95da-21db45d61...@kfu.com>, Nick Sayer via 
> time-
> nuts writes:
> 
>> If you’re in North America, a CHU receiver is a lot easier to make
>> than WWV/WWVH. The CHU timecode is just BEL 103 AFSK at 300 baud -
>> it was a one-chip solution 20 years ago when I made one in college.
> 
> We have CPUs and sounds-cards these days...
> 
> Also: The KiwiSDR is nearly perfect hardware, no matter which VLF/HF
> station you want:  You can track GPS and four (possibly 8) VLF/HF
> stations at the same time.
> 
> -- 
> Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
> p...@freebsd.org         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
> FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
> Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to