Hoi Rick,
On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 07:17:21 -0700
"Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <rich...@karlquist.com> wrote:
> I think this is all described in the 1992 FCS papers,
> but the executive summary is that a direct synthesizer
> on 9192.63177 is to be avoided at all costs because
> of the danger of it leaking into the CBT cavity.
> This is also the reason why you don't multiply up
> a subharmonic of this frequency.
I don't get what you mean with "danger of leaking into the CBT cavity"?
When signal leakage into the cavity is a problem, shouldn't that also
exist for the signal after the mixer? And what does this leaking actually
mean? The 9192.63177 is supposed to end up in the cavity anyways.
Attila Kinali
--
Malek's Law:
Any simple idea will be worded in the most complicated way.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
