Hi We have a double issue here:
1) It’s a problem because “not enough information was given" 2) It’s a problem because “we are talking about it to much” Sorry, but there is absolutely no way at all both of those criteria can be met by me. I do believe that WiFi time protocols are an on topic item for TimeNuts. Given our ability to wander off topic for weeks on some subjects, it is a bit unclear just where those bounds actually are. I also believe that ping data is one way to come up with an upper bound on just how awful WiFi timing can be. If others have a similar single shot measure of WiFi round trip that can be run on a wide range of devices, I’d certainly be just as interested in that. Bob > On Jan 14, 2017, at 10:53 AM, John Hawkinson <jh...@mit.edu> wrote: > > This has nothing to do with time-nuts, can it stop please? > > [ I don't know what forum to send you to for "weird wifi problems"; there > is probably no good one, because it is a very common consumer problem :( ] > > NTP was mentioned because you (Bob Camp) had not defined the problem > very well, and asked some questions that it can solve. It will not <snip just like the others per requests to do so to reduce bandwidth> _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
