Antenna is a Tallysman TW4722.
I'll try a different antenna later. If nothing else, right now I've got regular
dropouts for failsafe testing...
But I feel a better solution is a reliable holdover capability, which I should
have anyway for failsafe.
Thanks,
Michael
On 01/11/2017 10:22 AM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
Ok, local RF interference sounds like a significant part of the problem. I would
suggest that swapping antennas might make sense. Not all “super interference
rejecting” antennas are created equal.
Bob
On Nov 1, 2017, at 9:55 AM, MLewis <mlewis...@rogers.com> wrote:
I'm also too close to that tall building that is reflecting the sats over the Bering
Strait at me. It's a military computer site, which I thought would be pretty tight on
stray RF, but it has antennas. I asked a friend who works there about my GPS issues and
if RF from the site may be influencing things. He hesitated, then said "'Yes'.
That's all I can say."
For first power up I had obtained an active antenna for multi-constellation and a
pre-filter that "provides protection from near frequency or strong harmonic
interfering signals."
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
