Hi

Obviously you need two more 8607’s ….. :)

I suspect you are correct and the OCXO is doing better than the close in data 
suggests. 

Bob

> On Feb 4, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote:
> 
> FYI: here's an old plot where I evaluated an Oscilloquartz 8607 BVA against a 
> H-maser. It gets down to 8e-14 but is likely a bit better. On this plot, I 
> suspect the short-term numbers were not the BVA oscillator or the TSC 5110A 
> analyzer, but the H-maser.
> 
> /tvb
> <log37169v.gif>_______________________________________________
> time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
> To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
> and follow the instructions there.

_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.

Reply via email to