Here's a link to data on an 8607-008. You may recognize the bottom plot
from a recent posting. :-) But the ADEV and PN data at the top of the
page is from the factory test data. The ADEV doesn't explicitly say so,
but I strongly believe it's based on comparison with a "gold standard" 8607.
http://febo.com/pages/oscillators/bva/
John
----
On 02/04/2018 02:38 PM, Bob kb8tq wrote:
Hi
Obviously you need two more 8607’s ….. :)
I suspect you are correct and the OCXO is doing better than the close in data
suggests.
Bob
On Feb 4, 2018, at 8:33 AM, Tom Van Baak <t...@leapsecond.com> wrote:
FYI: here's an old plot where I evaluated an Oscilloquartz 8607 BVA against a
H-maser. It gets down to 8e-14 but is likely a bit better. On this plot, I
suspect the short-term numbers were not the BVA oscillator or the TSC 5110A
analyzer, but the H-maser.
/tvb
<log37169v.gif>_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
_______________________________________________
time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com
To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts
and follow the instructions there.
