Hi I guess it is time to ask:
Is this a commercial product you are designing? If so, that raises a whole added layer to this discussion in terms of “does it do what it says it does?”. Bob > On May 13, 2018, at 3:07 AM, Oleg Skydan <olegsky...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Bob! > > From: "Bob kb8tq" <kb...@n1k.org> >> It’s only useful if it is accurate. Since you can “do code” that gives you >> results that are better than reality, >> simply coming up with a number is not the full answer. To be useful as ADEV, >> it needs to be correct. > > I understand it, so I try to investigate the problem to understand what can > be done (if any :). > >> I’m sure it will come out to be a very cool counter. My *only* concern here >> is creating inaccurate results >> by stretching to far with what you are trying to do. Keep it to the stuff >> that is accurate. > > I am interested in accurate results or at least with well defined limitations > for a few specific measurements/modes. So I will try to make results as > accurate as I can do/it can be done keeping simple hardware. > > Thanks! > Oleg > _______________________________________________ > time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com > To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts > and follow the instructions there. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@febo.com To unsubscribe, go to https://www.febo.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts and follow the instructions there.
