tsho...@gmail.com said: > As a frequency standard I have no major disagreement with the PTTI article. > But the 100 microsecond number they give for absolute time transfer seems to > be based entirely on propagation characteristics and ignores the difficulty > I've always had in resolving the mushy edge of the timecode pulses. 100 > microseconds implies a system bandwidth of 10kHz, which is pointless because > the transmitter antenna bandwidth has to be quite narrow - hundreds of Hz if > not less.
Does NIST publish the transmitter bandwidth? I've never seen it, but I haven't done a serious search. Maybe somebody near enough to get a clean signal could measure it. What does a spectrogram look like? -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. _______________________________________________ time-nuts mailing list -- time-nuts@lists.febo.com To unsubscribe, go to http://lists.febo.com/mailman/listinfo/time-nuts_lists.febo.com and follow the instructions there.
