Brad Knowles on 2005-07-29 08:39:55 +0200: > At 1:12 PM +1200 2005-07-29, Simon Lyall wrote: > > > Is support for EDNS0 ( DNS UDP packets bigger than 512 octets) common? > > It's picking up, but there are still significant percentages of > servers and clients out there that can't handle it. Part of the > problem is that even if the ISP nameserver can handle it, the local > resolver is much less likely to be able to do so. This means that > you might be okay server-to-server, but client-to-server still runs > into the same old truncation problems. > > Of course, BIND is the only nameserver I know of that handles EDNS0.
Microsoft nameservers bundled with Windows 2003 support EDNS0.
pgpYrWHPeM8KY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ timekeepers mailing list [email protected] https://fortytwo.ch/mailman/cgi-bin/listinfo/timekeepers
